: ITAT Delhi quashes LTCG addition for Veena Gupta, citing violation of natural justice due to denial of cross-examination of key witnesses.
ITAT Delhi rules for Shoubit Goel (HUF), allowing LTCG u/s 10(38) on Unno Industries shares. Lack of specific evidence against assessee overrides AO’s doubts.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment passed on a non-existing entity [i.e. Union Bank of India] not sustainable since the same is amalgamated with Punjab National Bank and accordingly, Union Bank of India has lost its existence.
Coordinate Tribunal in the case of Arti Dhall vs. DCIT has held that in the case on hand undoubtedly the satisfaction note u/s 153C of the Act was recorded on 27.09.2022 which falls in the previous year 2022-23 relevant to the AY 2023-24.
ITAT Delhi quashes assessments due to mechanical approvals under Section 153D, citing lack of application of mind. Learn about key judicial precedents and findings.
This is a peculiar case wherein assessee has declared as a single owner and sold the property, however purchased two properties and registered one property in the name of his mother on the basis of inheritance.
Gulshan Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs JCIT (OSD) (ITAT Delhi) No Addition u/s 153A without incriminating material found during search – Statements of third parties not sufficient: ITAT Delhi Gulshan Investment Pvt. Ltd & others Vs JCIT -ITA No.3872/Del/2024 dt 16.4.25 The core dispute involves additions made by the AO u/s 153A following a search & […]
Delhi ITAT quashes reassessment in Vijender Nath Gupta case, citing AO’s failure to properly quantify escaped income during reopening.
ITAT Delhi rules Crocs Inc.’s service income not taxable in India under DTAA, as services did not “make available” technical knowledge to Crocs India.
Delhi ITAT: Section 153D approval requires specific application of mind per assessment year, not blanket or mechanical. Assessment quashed.
