The cancellation of registration under Section 12AB was not justified as PCIT lacked jurisdiction and that the “specified violation” clause under Section 12AB(4) was inapplicable for the financial years in question.
Delhi ITAT voids IHG IT Services’ assessment for AY 2010-11, citing procedural delay in passing the final order after DRP directions under Section 144C(13).
The ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment order against Dabur Pharma Ltd. for being time-barred, clarifying the mandatory one-month deadline for Assessing Officers under Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following DRP directions.
The ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment order against Dentsply India (P) Ltd., ruling it was time-barred under Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act. The order highlights mandatory timelines for Assessing Officers after DRP directions.
ITAT Delhi quashed a tax assessment against Adobe Systems India P. Ltd., ruling it time-barred. The court highlighted the Assessing Officer’s failure to adhere to the statutory deadline post-DRP directions.
Delhi ITAT allows assessee’s appeal, removing Rs. 4.92 lakh cash deposit addition after High Court remand, citing verified bank withdrawals as source.
ITAT Delhi upholds Syed Habibur Rehman’s ₹1.5 Cr NSEL bad debt claim, citing post-1989 law: proving irrecoverability not required if written off.
ITAT Delhi quashes ₹2.2 crore tax addition on Mall Hotel Ltd., ruling assessee not obligated to prove source of source for A.Y. 2006-07.
ITAT Delhi deletes Section 68 additions on unsecured loans for Prayag Polytech, stating assessee proved identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness.
ITAT Delhi held that apportionment of license fees as 10% towards recorded events and 90% towards live coverage instead of 5% and 95% as claimed by sports broadcasters. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
