High court held that licensing of software products of Microsoft in the Territory of India by the Respondent was not taxable in India as Royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act read with Article 12 of the Indo US DTAA.
Bhagwati Transformer Corp. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi (Delhi High Court) 1. By this order, I shall decide the above applications seeking interim relief, inasmuch as to stay the impugned order. 2. The common case of the petitioners in these petitions, as contended by their counsel, is a challenge to an order dated February […]
Kurz India Private Limited Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) Appellant submits that in this case reopening is initiated on the basis of review and re-appreciation of the same material i.e. audited accounts which were subject to verification in the course of original assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) which is not permissible in law. Upon perusal […]
CIT (Exemptions) Vs Shugan Chandra Kothari Trust (Delhi High Court) It is settled law that an appeal under Section 260A of the Act is to be entertained only when it directly and substantially affects the rights of the parties or is not free from difficulty or call for discussion of alternative views or the factual […]
La Mode Fashions Private Limited Vs Commissioner, Value Added Tax (Delhi High Court) The short question that arises for consideration before this Court is the remedial measure by which the inadvertent and bonafide error can be corrected. Respondent has suggested a methodology in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the counter affidavit, as aforementioned. This methodology, […]
Raj Singh Gehlot Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Delhi High Court) As per the prosecution complaint, in total, Term loan of Rs.810 crores was availed by AHPL and sanctioned by the consortium of banks. The funds were disbursed through an Escrow Account maintained with J&K Bank, Ansal Plaza Branch. The FIR was registered against the applicant, […]
Aanchal Mittal Vs Ankur Shukla (Delhi High Court) High Court held that a jurisdiction cannot be vested on a Court by agreement of the parties if that Court inherently lacks jurisdiction. It is evident from the facts of the present case that there is no principal or subordinate office of the LLP in the State […]
Jai Singh Goel Vs Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) & Anr. (Delhi High Court) Impugned Order dated 21.08.2018 rejects the application of the petitioner seeking compounding of offence on two grounds: 1) That the application has been filed beyond the period of limitation; 2) The petitioner already stands convicted by the Competent Court. As […]
Summons for appearance issued under Section 70 of the CGST Act and the authorization for arrest issued under Section 69 (1) of the CGST Act, do not fall within the ambit of the definition of Criminal Proceedings, because criminal proceeding commences, only after the launch of prosecution. It
Ram Gaua Raksha Dal Vs UOI (Delhi High Court) Since the right of every person under Article 21 and Article 25 is impacted by what is offered on a platter, in our view it is fundamental that a full and complete disclosure regarding the food article being vegetarian or non vegetarian is made a part […]
