Sharad Garg Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) By way of the present batch of petitions, this Court has been called upon to decide the validity of E-notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The Petitioners have classified the matters in the following categories: 1. Category […]
SSG Furnising LLP Vs Assistant Commissioner (Delhi High Court) Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned show cause notice dated 14th February, 2022 issued by the Respondents as well as for directions to the Respondents to remove the suspension of GST Registration of the Petitioner and to declare Rule 21A of the CGST […]
Union Bank Of India Vs Sh D.C. Chaturvedi (Delhi High Court) Section 4(6)(a) of the Act, however, provides that the gratuity of an employee, whose services may have been terminated for the reasons as specified therein, can be forfeited to the extent of damage or loss so caused. The relevant provision reads as under: “(6) […]
Delhi High Court upholds conviction in cheque bounce case. Revision petition dismissed. Learn more about the legal implications of bounced cheques.
Union of India Vs Central Information Commission (Delhi High Court) Undoubtedly, the Appellant (Enforcement Directorat) is an intelligence and security organization specified in Second Schedule of RTI Act and is exempt from the purview of RTI Act except when the information pertains to allegation of corruption and human rights violation. Consequently, the submission made by […]
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited Vs Controller General of Patents Designs And Trademarks (Delhi High Court) HC held that in view of the fact that the office of the CGPDTM was represented before this Court by two senior officials, namely, Mr. Sachin Sharma and Mr. Juneja, who did not disclose to this Court or to their […]
Delhi High Court ruling on Budweiser trademark infringement. Defendants restrained from using recycled Budweiser bottles for BLACK FORT and POWER COOL beers.
Mayur Batra Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Petitioner states that before levying the penalty under section 271(1)(c), the replies of the petitioner filed on 17th December, 2021 and reiterated as well as uploaded on 22nd and 27th January, 2022 were not considered by the respondents. He further states that the petitioner has not been granted […]
Ericsson India Private Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) It is not as if the petitioner/assessee is not offering unearned revenue for tax; it is only on account of accounting policy followed consistently that unearned revenue is offered for tax in the year in which services are rendered and/or goods are sold. Thus, the transaction, […]
According to Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, every provisional attachment order ceases to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date the order was passed under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act.
