Court is of the view that the recovery of the annual report and the share certificate of the Petitioner from premises of Minda Group cannot be considered to be incriminating documents.
Delhi High Court held that issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act to an unrelated e-mail address doesn’t constitute as due dispatch
Seema Gupta Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) HC held that renting of a residential dwelling by a proprietor of a registered proprietorship firm, who rents it in his/her own personal capacity for use as his/her own residence as well as not for use in the course or furtherance of business of […]
Pratibha-Mosinzhstroi Consortium Vs Commissioner of CGST (Delhi High Court) High Court held that Impugned order cannot cancelling GST Registration of Appellant be sustained for the following reasons which proves that entire Proceedings was Legally Flawed (i) Firstly, the SCN dated 08.07.2021 gave no clue whatsoever, as to what was the infraction committed by the petitioner-consortium, […]
Mere submission of emails & form 16A, do not, in any way, prove that there existed any relationship of employer employee between parties
Income from supply of CAS and middleware products to indian customers, does not fall under ‘royalty’ as defined under Section 9(l)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of India- Swiss DTAA.
PCIT Vs Macquarie Global Services Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) HC held held that inclusion or exclusion of comparables per se cannot be treated as a question of law unless it is demonstrated to the Court that the Tribunal took into account irrelevant consideration or excluded irrelevant factors in the ALP that impact significantly. In […]
Where assessee has mixed funds (made up partly of interest free funds and partly of interest bearing funds) and payment is made out of mixed fund, the investment must be considered to have been made out of interest free fund.
High Court held that non supply of notice for physical inspection during the search proceeding, before issuing an order, will be termed as violation of principle of natural justice.
Held that ad-interim injunction provided from the use of TATA in website tatabonus.com; crypto products by the name of $TATA or any other product being sold on the website www.hakunamatata.finance.
