Delhi HC directs Customs to pay current market value of seized gold, disposed of without informing the owner, plus costs for delay.
Delhi HC dismisses revenue’s appeal, affirming that cash sales during demonetization, accounted for and taxed, cannot be treated as unexplained income u/s 68.
Delhi High Court sets aside ₹14.63 crore penalty on Property Plus Realtors, ruling the order was issued beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
Delhi High Court dismisses appeal in PCIT vs Thapar Homes Ltd, ruling penalty under Section 271E was time-barred under Section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
In Seth Banarsi Dass Gupta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, it is held that the High Court within whose jurisdiction the AO has passed the assessment order would have the jurisdiction to entertain the appeal under Section 260A of the Act.
Delhi High Court held that approval accorded in terms of section 153D of the Income Tax Act in a mechanical manner without application of mind is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed and assessment order quashed.
It is well settled that once a statute prescribes a specific period of limitation, the Appellate Authority does not inherently hold any power to condone the delay in filing the appeal by invoking the provisions of Section 5 or 29 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Delhi HC directs Customs to release detained gold, iPhone, and more after failure to issue a Show Cause Notice within six months. Read the full case summary.
Delhi High Court sets aside GST demand order citing non-application of mind, as the tax officer failed to provide a reasoned decision after reviewing objections.
The US Transactions were subject to the Mutual Agreement Procedure between the competent authorities of US and India under Article 27 of the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
