The respondent’s case that it was entitled to forfeit the sum of ₹60,00,000/- paid by the petitioner rested solely on the ground that it was earnest money and therefore, it could be forfeited in terms of the Agreement.
HC observed that the debt which the ‘Corporate Debtor’ owes for payment in future, if not taken into consideration in the ‘Resolution Plan’ does not extinguish automatically and the creditors, including the ‘Financial Creditor’ or ‘Operational Creditor’ or ‘Secured Creditor’ or ‘Unsecured Creditor’ has rights to claim the same.
Section 12 is essentially a provision which enables the Registrar to permit registration of a mark which is identical or similar to an existing mark in respect of same or similar goods. It does not envisage honest and concurrent user as a defence to an allegation of infringement of a registered trade mark.
Harsh Sehgal Vs State & Anr (Delhi High Court) Facts- The complainant/respondent no. 2, Galaxy Datamatics Pvt. Ltd., averred that the accused no. 1, M/S Takshila Retail Pvt. Ltd., earlier known as M/s Blues Clothing Pvt. Ltd., accused no. 2, Dinesh Sehgal and accused no. 3, Harsh Sehgal, approached the respondent no.2 for a short-term […]
Ketan Ribbons Pvt Ltd Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (Delhi High Court) Hon’ble Delhi High Court quashed Assessment Order, Notice of demand and Penalty notice passed on 23-05-2021 during COVID-19 where show cause notice and draft assessment order were issued during lockdown and the assessee could not file any reply. The court further was […]
Delhi HC allows petition challenging recovery notices. Petitioner seeks leniency citing financial constraints and health issues.
Kiran Infra Engineers Limited Vs Northern Railway (Delhi High Court) The question as to whether the supplementary agreement is a full and final discharge of respective obligations under the principal agreement and also rescinds the terms and conditions of the principal agreement is itself in dispute, which requires to be referred to Arbitral Tribunal. The […]
Millennium Education Foundation Vs Educomp Infrastructure And School Management Limited (Delhi High Court) The Supreme Court has categorically held that the adjudicating authority i.e., NCLT has a duty to advert to the contentions put forth on the application filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and to examine the material placed before it and record […]
Union of India Vs Delhi State Consumer Co Operative Federation Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Facts- According to Union of India, Delhi State Consumers Co-operative Federation Limited (respondent) failed to furnish the requisite security deposit, as a result of which each of the contracts were cancelled at the risk and cost of the respondent. The Union […]
Analysis of Delhi HC Ruling on order passed under Section 148A(d) passed by order Delhi High Court in the case of Divya Capital One Private Limited Vs. ACIT, alleging income of more than Rs one lakh crore having escaped assessment.
