Courts: CESTAT Bangalore
409 articlesService Tax

Service Tax
Technical support service rendered online to foreign companies were ‘Export Of Service’ and not Intermediary service, refund of Rs. 16.8 Cr was allowable
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Section 149 of Customs Act doesn’t not prescribe any time limit: CESTAT Bangalore
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Customs duty payable on quantity of crude oil actually received in shore tank in India
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Exporters Can Claim Notification Benefit Later for Reimported Goods if not availed initially
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Benefit of notification 52/2003-Cus. dated 31.03.2003 admissible on re-import of rejected goods
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Due to 325-Day Filing Delay
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Traders Eligible for SAD Exemption Without Duty Endorsement on Invoices
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
CESTAT Remands Timber SAD Refund Case for Reconsideration
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Proceedings Unsustainable Due to Denial of Cross-Examination: Violation of CBLR, 2013
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
No Legal Requirement to Declare MRP in Bill of Entry; Only to Affix on Retail Packages
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Availing Carnet De Passage benefit by mis-declaring purpose of export of Ferrari Motor Car unjustified: CESTAT Bangalore
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Import benefit extended to DLP data projectors with video port as classified under CTH 8528 6100: CESTAT Bangalore
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
Differential duty demand confirmed as brush cutter mis-declared as power operated reapers: CESTAT Bangalore
Custom Duty

Custom Duty
