Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs Antrax Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs Vs Antrax Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Bangalore)

CESTAT Bangalore held that DLP data projectors having additional facility of video port are classifiable under CTH 8528 6100 and not under 8528 6900 and accordingly, benefit of notification no. 24/2005-Cus dated 01.03.2005 extended to its import.

Facts- The issue involved in these appeals lies in a very narrow compass viz., classification of DLP data projectors. In Appeal No. C/20068/2018 (M/s. Antrax Technologies Pvt. Ltd.), the respondent declared their imported product as “Video

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31