Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M.S. Clothing Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M.S. Clothing Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)

CESTAT Bangalore held that benefit of notification no. 20/2006 dated 01.03.2006 and notification no. 21/2012-Cus. dated 17.03.2012 not available in case of import of garment accessories. Accordingly, 4% SAD leviable.

Facts- The appellant had imported garment accessories vide various Bills of Entry and warehoused the goods and thereafter Ex-bond Bills of Entry were filed for debonding the goods by claiming the benefit of Notification No.20/2006 dated 01.03.2006 (Sl.No.50) and Notification No.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31