CESTAT held that interpretation of policy provisions lies within jurisdiction of DGFT, whose opinion is binding. Therefore, restriction applied by Customs Department was deemed unsustainable.
CESTAT Bangalore sets aside penalty imposed under Customs Act on Orbit Trans Express & Freight Pvt. Ltd. Allegations of dummy import debunked. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
Discover the CESTAT Bangalore judgment on Pigeon International vs. Commissioner of Customs. Analysis of penalties, violations, and conclusions.
CESTAT Bangalore directs re-adjudication rejecting appeals on classification of imported insoluble sulphur. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
CESTAT Bangalore rules on Mineral Enterprises Ltd. case, emphasizing no extended limitation for de-bonding burnt goods amid riots. Detailed analysis inside.
CESTAT Bangalore ruling on AEG Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case underscores that misdeclaration invites extended limitation.
CESTAT Bangalore quashes violation allegations against Ajay Overseas Shipping, emphasizing brokers’ duty to advise clients on law compliance. Full order review.
In the case of Vidya Herbs Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs, the CESTAT Bangalore ruled on the denial of benefits for coffee beans import under a notification. Get the full analysis here.
Bharti Airtel’s appeal for customs duty exemption on Battery Fuse Units dismissed by CESTAT Bangalore. Learn about the classification dispute and its implications.
Explore the CESTAT Bangalore’s decision on the classification of imported “Student interactive respond system,” as it delves into the applicability of Customs Tariff Chapter Note 5(E) and the implications for classification under CTH 8543.
