Kajal Dutta Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court) The learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submitted that garnishee proceedings have been initiated by the authorities by way of attachment of the appellant’s bank When the appeal was presented, the mandatory pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax has been complied with by […]
Surojit Das Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court) The learned Advocate for the appellant would submit that in terms of Section 129(1)9a) of WBGST /CGST Act, the appellant can seek for release of the goods without prejudice to the rights and contentions of either parties. In fact, the learned Single Bench in […]
Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Writ Court should not scrutinise an adjudicating authority’s decision itself, by acting as an appellate authority over such order of the authority and substitute the findings of an authority by reappreciating the evidence and material and more particularly the nature of a case like this.
Assessment year involved for reopening of assessment is assessment year 2016-2017 and appropriate authority for grant of approval in such case are authorities under Section 151(ii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Where authority while cancelling GST registration solely relied upon statement made by receptionist of building who could not recognise appellant’s photograph, proper course was followed, therefore, matter was to be remanded to original authority for conducting fresh enquiry
The petitioner clients are strictly complying with the rules and regulations of the aforesaid COTP Act 2003 and other applicable statues and rules. They only permit use of tobacco, nicotine and herbal products in the hookahs Since there is no law banning the use of tobacco, nicotine and herbal products in bars and restaurants
Rupahali Sarees Private Limited Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) Sub-The petition in this case filed to challenge inaction on part of CIT (Appeals) in deciding the appeal against order u/s 263 which was filed on 27-1-2020 even though almost 3 years had passed. Petitioner submits that in spite of repeated remainders though almost […]
held that the assessee cannot be penalised by demanding late fee where, assessee had not filed GST returns due to cancellation of GST Registration on factually incorrect grounds.
Surendra Kumar Singhi Vs Registrar of Companies, West Bengal & Anr (Calcutta High Court) Sub- What is the criteria for determining whether the director is an additional director or independent director? Also whether an additional director is liable for prosecution regarding the non reporting of fullest information and explanation in the Board’s report on comments […]
So far as the penalty is concerned on such refundable amount, petitioner is not liable to pay the same since admittedly the respondent/revenue authorities’ own case is that the amount of refund in question was paid to the petitioner due to mistake on their part and for no fault on the part of the petitioner.
