The Court addressed the delay in executing a Section 14 SARFAESI order and directed authorities to hand over possession within four weeks. The ruling ensures timely implementation despite administrative transfer issues.
Calcutta High Court held that reversal of CENVAT Credit made was voluntary and doesn’t tantamount to pre-deposit within the meaning of the pre amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
The Court ruled that an effective hearing is mandatory under Section 73 of the WBGST Act. The impugned order was quashed, allowing the petitioner to file a reply and contest the tax determination.
The High Court set aside the Tribunal’s order after finding it failed to consider binding rulings on DGFT authority and import restrictions under the FTDR Act. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication based on established legal principles.
The Calcutta High Court permitted Subrata Mondal to clear his tax liability in installments after an initial ₹10 lakh payment, directing the appeal to be heard on merits.
Calcutta High Court directed the CGST authorities to defer proceedings on a show-cause notice that clubbed four financial years. The petitioner argued that such bunching and lack of scrutiny under Section 61 violated due process.
Calcutta High Court directs CGST authorities to accept a delayed appeal against a Section 73 order and re-examine a pending SCN after restoring the petitioner’s GST portal access.
Calcutta High Court admits plea challenging GST adjudication order and validity of CBIC notifications extending limitation period under Section 168A of the CGST Act.
Calcutta HC ruled on challenging a Faceless Assessment order, directing the taxpayer to file an appeal when an objection to the 143(2) notice wasn’t raised earlier.
Calcutta High Court held that writ petition is not entertained due to availability of alternative efficacious remedy under the provisions of Income Tax Act against the final assessment order. Accordingly, writ petition dismissed.
