Calcutta High Court

HC allows GST TRAN-1 filing as system of Taxpayer was down

Mrinal Ghosh Vs Union of India & Ors (Calcutta High Court)

On facts, case of petitioner is that it could not attempt to file GST TRAN –1 form on GST portal because his own system was down. On 9th January, 2018, deadline having expired on 27th December, 2017, petitioner said so to Revenue. Petitioner then has obtained a report, upon forensic examination of his system, having provided password, w...

Read More

Section 234B / 234C interest on income arising from retrospective operation of any statute, decision etc.

Pr. CIT Vs M/s. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)

Imposition of interest is justified under sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, save and except on the income which arises from retrospective operation of any statute, decision etc....

Read More

Gift deed not invalid only because it was registered after death of donor

Dinabandhu Mondal & Ors. Vs Laxmi Rani Mondal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)

Dinabandhu Mondal & Ors. Vs Laxmi Rani Mondal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) The respondents have raised serious doubt over the authenticity of the said deed of gift because of the fact that it was registered after the death of the donor. However, well established is the law that it is not necessary for the […]...

Read More

Payment for delayed allotment of plot of land cannot be construed as ‘interest’

Pr. CIT Vs West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (Calcutta High Court)

The issue which falls for decision therefore is whether payment for delayed allotment of a plot of land by the Housing Board to an allottee will fall under the definition of ‘interest’ under section 2 (28A) of the Act....

Read More

AO not bound to follow formula prescribed in rule 8D to compute disallowance u/s. 14A

Pr. CIT Vs  Britannia Industries Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)

Pr. CIT Vs Britannia Industries Ltd (Calcutta High Court) If an assessing officer doubts the quantum of expenditure incurred towards exempted income, is it mandatory for the assessing officer to apply the formula prescribed in rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 or can he take a view otherwise? This is the question which is […]...

Read More

AO cannot treat commodity losses as bogus merely because broker was expelled from commodity exchange

Pr. CIT Vs Ms BLB Cables and Conductors Pvt. Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)

Principal CIT Vs Ms Blb Cables And Conductors Pvt. Ltd. (Calcutta High Court) Assessee has incurred losses from the off market commodity transactions and the AO held such loss as bogus and inadmissible in the eyes of the law. The same loss was also confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). However we find that all the […]...

Read More

Only Advocates are authorized to plead and argue on behalf of litigants before court of law

Usha Kanta Das (Deceased) Vs SM. Sefalika Ash (Calcutta High Court)

Only a special class of persons, namely, Advocates enrolled under The Advocates Act, 1961, have been authorised to plead and argue before a court of law, thus, any other person authorized or a recognized agent can do 'other than pleading'....

Read More

Prosecution proceedings justified on failure to disclose foreign bank accounts under Black Money and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015

Shrivardhan Mohta Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court)

Where assessee was given an opportunity to make the disclosure with regard to foreign bank accounts and the amount lying thereat however assessee failed to avail the  opportunity to make disclosure with regard thereto while submitting his return in the proceedings under search and seizure and also before Settlement Commission, the author...

Read More

Sec. 154 rectification can be invoked in case order of assessment inconsistent with a binding precedent.

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs JCIT (Calcutta High Court)

Where an assessment order not in tuned with the law laid down by a binding precedent, it would amount to an error apparent on the record for the purpose of invoking rectification under section 154....

Read More

Deduction U/s. 80IB not allowable on non filing of Return within prescribed time U/s. 139(1)

Suolificio Linea Italia (India) (P) Ltd. Vs JCIT (Calcutta High Court)

Suolificio Linea Italia (India) (P) Ltd. Vs JCIT (Calcutta High Court) Conclusion: Deduction under section 80-IB was not allowable in case assessee did not file its return of income for relevant assessment year within period prescribed under section 139(1) as per the condition imposed by section 80AC. Held: When the governing provision i....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,376)
Company Law (5,172)
Custom Duty (7,494)
DGFT (4,053)
Excise Duty (4,279)
Fema / RBI (3,904)
Finance (4,054)
Income Tax (31,265)
SEBI (3,249)
Service Tax (3,483)