Case Law Details
Md. Yusuf Vs State Tax Officer (Calcutta High Court)
The issue involved is highly disputed question of fact with regard to registration of the ‘Teak Sawn Timber’ not tallying with the declaration made in the E-way bill and invoices and further there is no existence of consignor at his registered place of business, this Court in exercise of constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot act as a fact finding and verification authority over transported the goods in question.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the respondent GST authority, under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act and WBGST Act, 2017 dated 10th August, 2022.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
