Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deletes addition of Rs. 16.04 lakhs, ruling CPC lacked jurisdiction for adjustment under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Income Tax Tribunal rules on Rs. 23.33 lakh addition, clarifying Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) for land held as stock-in-trade versus personal asset.
An assessee’s appeal against a ₹36.34 lakh cash deposit addition was dismissed by NFAC, New Delhi, due to a procedural error. The challenge targeted a rectification order, not the original assessment.
Mumbai ITAT dismisses Revenue appeal, affirming CIT(A)’s decision to delete ₹37.84 Cr bogus purchase addition for a bulk drug manufacturer, citing sufficient evidence.
ITAT Jaipur held that disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act untenable since amount of commission paid to a non resident outside India for the services rendered outside India will not fall in the category of income, and as such would not be chargeable to tax.
ITAT Raipur held that reopening of proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond a period of 4 years without failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully & truly all the material facts is liable to be annulled.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition invoking provisions of section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act without referring the valuation of the capital asset to the valuation officer is not justifiable. Accordingly, matter restored back to AO to refer the matter to valuation officer for determining Fair Market Value.
Tribunal remanded the matter after finding that the appellate authority dismissed the appeal mechanically without examining the assessee’s grounds.
ITAT Agra rules LLP’s decision to audit accounts qualifies for extended IT return due date, enabling business loss carry forward despite initial denial by CPC.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards cash deposited in the bank account during demonetization period deleted since source of cash deposit duly explained.
