Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shravan Singh Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017–18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shravan Singh Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards cash deposited in the bank account during demonetization period deleted since source of cash deposit duly explained.

Facts- Assessee has preferred the present appeal. The only grievance raised by the assessee, in the present appeal, is against the addition of Rs.12,24,500/- under section 69A of the Income Tax Act on account of cash deposits in the bank account during t

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30