ITAT Delhi held that provisions of section 43B of the Income Tax Act is not attracted to the licensee/assessee in respect of electricity duty. Thus, question is answered in favour of the assessee and hence appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Chandigarh held that invocation of revisionary power under section 263 of the Income Tax Act not sustainable since PCIT failed to establish that assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Pune ruled for Yash Construction Co., holding that declared income during survey, if linked to business, cannot be taxed at higher rates under Section 115BBE.
ITAT Pune rules for Late Harilal Mavjibhai Patel, confirming excess stock found during survey is business income, not subject to higher tax rates under Section 115BBE.
ITAT Hyderabad rules for Taj GVK Hotels, allowing interest deduction, prior period expense, and accepting accounting method change for AY 2003-04.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Piem Hotels, overturning Section 14A disallowance for AY 2014-15 & 2016-17 due to AO’s lack of recorded satisfaction.
This appeal concerns a trust’s income tax exemption and the utilization of accumulated income. The Tribunal reviewed whether the initial assessment, which did not tax past surpluses, was erroneous, and allowed the trust’s appeal.
This case examines whether extensive hotel renovations are revenue or capital expenditures under the Income Tax Act, analyzing arguments from the Revenue and the assessee, and referencing key court decisions.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules Section 56(2)(x) applies to agricultural land. Assessee’s dispute on stamp duty valuation mandates DVO reference. Case remanded for re-evaluation.
ITAT Raipur held that the appeal is treated as withdrawn due to initiation of proceedings under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (VSVS 2024) by filing of Form 1. Thus, present appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
