Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Clayking Minerals LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Clayking Minerals LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Sec 56(2)(x) applies to any immovable property, including agricultural land & when the assessee disputes stamp duty valuation, AO must refer to DVO

Assessee’s   income tax return  filed declaring  loss   was selected for ‘Limited Scrutiny’ through CASS to examine whether the purchase value of a property was less than the value determined by the stamp valuation authority u/s 56(2)(x).Â

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessee proves identity & creditworthiness of lender: Upholds deletion of Addition Double addition on same property transaction: Bangalore ITAT remands matter to AO ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Non-Compliance with GKN Drive Shaft Judgment Loose Papers / dumb documents Lack Corroboration: ITAT Quashes Addition Accommodation Entry Addition Unsustainable Without Evidence: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031