The ITAT ruled that a tax addition under Section 56(2)(x) cannot be made solely on stamp duty value. The AO must first obtain a DVO valuation.
The ITAT Raipur condoned a 1,742-day delay for an assessee, restoring their appeal. The ruling emphasizes a justice-oriented approach and bars CIT(A) from dismissing cases solely for delay.
ITAT Kolkata ruled a tax notice invalid for not specifying scrutiny type, quashing the entire assessment. The ruling reinforces that tax authorities must follow CBDT instructions.
The ITAT Rajkot condoned a 518-day delay for Arham Enterprise, setting aside an ex parte CIT(A) order. The tribunal’s decision prioritizes a case’s merits over technicalities.
The ITAT Kolkata deleted a ₹11.35 crore addition, holding that a retracted survey statement and “dumb documents” are insufficient to prove undisclosed income under Section 69A.
The ITAT Raipur ruled that the CIT(A) overstepped its jurisdiction by remanding a multi-crore TDS dispute involving SECL. The decision clarifies that a CIT(A) cannot remand cases that were not assessed under Section 144.
The ITAT Raipur restores Section 10(10D) exemption, ruling the CPC exceeded its powers by making a complex adjustment on an insurance policy’s maturity proceeds.
The ITAT has deleted gross profit additions made to Sunil Garg’s income, ruling that the Assessing Officer’s actions were arbitrary and lacked incriminating material.
The ITAT Mumbai, in the case of DCIT vs. JM Financial Services, ruled that a loss from speculative share trading cannot be set off against a profit from non-speculative Futures and Options (F&O) transactions.
The ITAT in Mumbai has restricted an income tax disallowance on alleged bogus purchases for Quality Heightcon, capping it at 12.5% of the total amount and citing judicial precedents.
