Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Debasis Das Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-2021
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Debasis Das Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) No Straight Reliance on Stamp Value – DVO Valuation Must Precede 56(2)(x) Addition-Tribunal Protects Assessee from Mechanical Addition Based on Stamp Duty Value Assessee had filed return declaring income of Rs. 19.98 lakh. During scrutiny, AO noted that Assessee along with his wife, Smt. Nineesha Das, had purchased a plot for Rs. 79.92 lakh while the stamp duty value was Rs. 1.39 crore. Assessee’s 3/4th share of the differential amount of Rs. 59.94 lakh was worked out at Rs. 44.95 lakh, which AO added as income from other sources u/s 56(2)(x). The CIT(A)/N...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930