Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Debasis Das Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-2021
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Debasis Das Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) No Straight Reliance on Stamp Value – DVO Valuation Must Precede 56(2)(x) Addition-Tribunal Protects Assessee from Mechanical Addition Based on Stamp Duty Value Assessee had filed return declaring income of Rs. 19.98 lakh. During scrutiny, AO noted that Assessee along with his wife, Smt. Nineesha Das, had purchased a plot for Rs. 79.92 lakh while the stamp duty value was Rs. 1.39 crore. Assessee’s 3/4th share of the differential amount of Rs. 59.94 lakh was worked out at Rs. 44.95 lakh, which AO added as income from other sources u/s 56(2)(x). The CIT(A)/N...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031