Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arham Enterprise Vs ITO (TDS) (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arham Enterprise Vs ITO (TDS) (ITAT Rajkot) 518-Day Delay Condoned- Ex Parte CIT(A) Order Set Aside- Tribunal Stresses Merits Over Technicalities AO treated the Assessee as a defaulter for non-collection of TCS on S.S. scrap & raised demand of Rs. 2.57 lakh for AY 2016-17 & Rs. 2.17 lakh for AY 2017-18, along with interest. Appeals before CIT(A)/NFAC were dismissed, doubting genuineness of Form 27C declarations filed belatedly after 28 months, & confirming liability. Assessee explained that notices & orders were uploaded on an email linked to a partner, which was wrongly forwar...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930