Since AO had not considered revised return of income which was filed within prescribed period of limitation for the difference between income disclosed in return and total receipts as per Form 26AS, therefore, the matter was remanded back to AO with direction to verify the fact and grant relief to assessee in accordance with law.
Landbase India Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Depreciation on the golf course – Whether depreciation should be allowed considering it as ‘plant and machinery or land or building. Matter: 1. Applicable Rate of Depreciation on Gulf course. Facts of the case 2. The Assessee is a company engaged in the business of operation of golf […]
Since neither AO conducted any enquiry nor had brought any clinching evidences to disprove the evidences produced by assessee and assessee had furnished all details including bank statement, share brokers note, ledger account copies, share certificates, in support of purchase and sale of shares and mode of payment and receipts of proceeds thus, no addition could be made under section 68 as AO had merely relied on investigation wing report without disputing vortex of evidences furnished by assessee.
Issues have been examined by the A.O and just because the opinion as arrived by the A.O is at a variation of the opinion of the learned Pr. CIT, would not grant the learned Pr. CIT the powers of revision u/s 263 of the Act.
Nikon Systems Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Admittedly, fire occurred during the year, the traded goods of the assessee are lost during the year due to fire. Such traded goods were the stock in trade of the assessee. Undoubtedly, the traded goods were insured with the insurance Co for any loss due to fire. […]
When the company got back its funds on the same day, it cannot fall into the definition of the deemed dividend.
Smt. Zeelia Zeena Mayzean Shenoy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The issue under consideration is whether or not income paid on interest against the fixed deposits can be said to have been incurred ‘wholly and exclusively’ for the purpose of earning interest income from fixed deposits? In the present case, the assessee made fixed deposit with […]
ACIT Vs Emaar MGF Construction Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) We find that the assessee is under the obligation to part away with the source of income to the holding company and it was not its volition alone, to give away the revenue that could have been otherwise accrued to them. An agreement entered into by […]
The assessee has written off the assets which were not found/traceable and as the assets were scattered over different areas, the entire exercise of listing of such fixed assets got crystallized during the year and hence, the booking of the expenditure under head prior period expenses of fixed assets, merits to be allowed in the hands of the assessee.
Sanjeev Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Dehradun) There is no dispute that there was a house property, which was noted by the borrowed capital of the family of the assessee. It is also not disputed that assessee was one of the applicant of the loan. Only dispute is with respect to the family settlement dated eighth day […]
