DCIT Vs Ebony Retail Holdings Ltd. (Delhi ITAT) It is not in dispute that assessee has given security deposit for taking the premises on lease. Learned Counsel for the Assessee referred to various replies filed by assessee-company at assessment stage which shows that assessee-company filed all the documentary evidences and explanation before A.O. on the […]
DCIT Vs Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd (ITAT Cuttack) In this case there is nothing to suggest that all the primary facts were not disclosed by the assessee at the time of original assessment completed u/s 143(3) of the Act nor any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly […]
BT Global Communications India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT (Delhi ITAT) The only issue to be decided in the present appeal relates to protective adjustment on account of business restructuring that has taken place in assessment year 2010-11. We find that TPO/DRP have made adjustment on substantive basis in assessment year 2010-11. However, since […]
The issue under consideration is whether disallowance of depreciation on car and interest on car loan by AO is justified in law?
whether the additional ground submitted by the assessee should be allowed by the tribunal by considering that the assessee has not claimed exemption in the return filed due to inadvertence?
The issue under consideration is whether the deduction u/s 35DD for demerger expenses is allowed to be claimed by resultant demerged company?
The issue under consideration is whether the Section 50C need to be complied at the time of computation of exemption u/s 54 or 54F?
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made u/s 69 by AO due to undisclosed sources of cash deposits in bank account is justified in law?
whether assessee can be held liable u/s 271B of the Act for not getting the books audited during the years when the advances were received from customers under percentage completion method?
The issue under consideration is whether the disallowance of expenditure u/s 14A by AO without recording a satisfaction is justified in law?
