Execution of unregistered Joint Development Agreement with an irrevocable Power of Attorney in favour of the Developer does not result in the “transfer” for capital gains liability.
Narendra Kumar Gill Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Moot issue to be decided is whether mentioning the PAN of another entity mistakenly instead of the PAN of the assessee makes the notice issued u/s 148 invalid or not when the notice is addressed to Shri Narendra Kumar Gill and the body of the notice clearly reflects […]
Gimpex Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) There is no dispute with regard to the fact that receivables is included under the definition of international transactions by amending section 92B by the Finance Act, 2012 w.e.f. 01.04.2002. Therefore, we are of the considered view that there is no merit in the arguments advanced by the […]
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: The investment in Tata Sons by assessee trust was not thus for the purpose of investment in shares, but this shareholding being held by the assessee trust was undisputedly for the purpose of sharing the fruits of the success, of the Tata Group, for the benefit […]
Manjula Finance Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is an undisputed fact that the assessee being the absolute owner of the shares gifted , had full enjoyment rights including to alienate, discard and even demolish, unless prohibited by some statutory provisions, it is within the powers of the assessee to make gift at its free […]
Flower valley Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We find that certain trees lying on assessee’s land were cut since the same were obstructing the hire tension wires of the Electricity Company. For the same, the assessee was compensated for Rs.10.14 Lacs during the year. We observe that the assessee was engaged in […]
Sir Ratan Tata Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Commissioner was clearly in error in invoking powers under section 263 on the ground that the Assessing Officer failed to examine the investments of the trust complying with the provisions of Section 11(5) and Section 13(1)(d) as how the trust was treating the investment, i.e., in […]
Nilesh Ajit Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) A perusal of the assessment order shows that the assessment was reopened to examine misuse of Client Code Modification for tax evasion. No addition was made by the Assessing Officer in respect of the issue for which the assessment was reopened. It is a well settled law […]
Capital Infra Projects Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The quarrel is in respect of loan received from M/s Pabla Leasing and Finance Pvt. Ltd amounting to Rs. 3 crores in each A.Y treated by the Assessing Officer as unexplained cash credit and, accordingly, additions have been made under section 68 of the Act. The […]
Maheshwari Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Learned Counsel submitted that initiation under section 147 of the I.T. Act have been done by mentioning the wrong Section 147(b) of the I.T. Act which is deleted from the Income Tax Act w.e.f. 01.04.1989, therefore, reopening is done under non-existent Section in a mechanical […]
