Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) At the outset, we find merit in the contention of the Ld. Counsel of the Assessee that in the absence of any adverse judgment by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court, i.e., the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana, there being divergence of judicial opinion on the subject […]
Discount offered on some of the prepaid mobile services did not partake the character of commission under Section 194H and hence there was no obligation to withhold tax on such discounts on prepaid services.
Sumeru Enterprises Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) The Ld. CIT(A) has ascertained the factual aspect that this is not a closure of business but temporary discontinuance of business. We further noted that in earlier years the interest expenditure claimed by assessee were allowed by the department itself. However, in the year under consideration the same was […]
JCIT (OSD) Vs Kingfisher Airlines Limited (ITAT Bangalore) The first issue is related to disallowance of helicopter expenses. We notice that the A.O. was constrained to make adhoc disallowance since the assessee has failed to furnish details called for by the A.O. We also notice that the assessee did not appear before Ld. CIT(A) also. […]
AO was not justified in denying the claim of deduction under section 80IC as interest income earned was inextricably linked to the main business activity of assessee as it was earned from fixed deposits which was required to be maintained as per the statutory requirements.
Sanjay Duggal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT observed that In some of the cases the approval was granted on the date the request was made for approval by the A.O. In all those cases merely draft assessment order and the assessment folders were available with the A.O. For example in the case of Shri Sanjay […]
Ashok B Sureban Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) AO levied penalty u/s. 271AAB of the Act on account of undisclosed income declared by the assessee during the post-survey proceedings on 6.8.2015. Against this, the assessee went in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). The CIT(Appeals) confirmed the levy of the penalty u/s. 271AAB of the Act. Aggrieved, the […]
We hold that the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source from the interest payments made to Associate members as per sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act.
We observe that the fund in question is a capital fund/corpus fund therefore, it is out of preview of the provisions of section 11(2) of the Act. Section 11 of the Act deals with the utilization of income of a trust. This section is not having any provision about the utilization of corpus donation/fund like general fund or other receipts.
Lalita Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) We have carefully considered the facts stated above in these appeals wherein the notice under section 148 is issued in the name of a deceased assessee stating his PAN number. Further the assessment orders are also framed in the name of the deceased assessee stating his PAN number. The […]
