DCIT Vs Monster.Com (India) Private Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) In the assessee’s own case the Tribunal observed that the assessee followed appropriate revenue recognition method of accounting and thus the income declared on proportional receipt basis cannot be questioned. This order was followed by the ITAT in the assessee’s own case in the A.Ys 2007-08 to […]
Additions made by AO was not only on the basis of sworn statement but also on the basis other evidences collected during the course of search including discrepancies in books of accounts regarding accounting of bogus purchases therefore, there was no merit in arguments of assessee that AO had made additions towards alleged purchases only on the basis of statement recorded from those parties without further evidences.
The instructions of the Board, which are statutory and binding on the revenue, assessing officer has no mandate to tax the cash deposit made in the bank account by the housewife if the amount is less than 2.5 lakh, during the Demonetization Scheme of 2016
Avtar Krishen Jalla Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) As per the provisions of Section 54, the assessee has to utilize the amount deposited in the capital gain account for the purpose of purchase or construction of the new asset within the specified time for availing the benefit of capital gain. Here the assessee has made payments […]
Liability under section 201(1A), which could only proceed on the foundational assumption that tax was deductible at source by the person making payment in question, will end up exonerating the person, in whose hands the income is taxable, of liability under section 234B.
G. Dasaratharami Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the ‘Agreement to sell’ dated 14.12.2007 contains the clause that the balance amount of Rs.16.50 lakhs shall be paid to the seller after obtaining occupancy certificate and also after giving possession of the property. There is also no […]
Since the revision proceedings u/s 263 had been apparently triggered only based on borrowed satisfaction i.e Audit Objection and not based on independent application of mind by PCIT therefore, the revision order passed by PCIT u/s 263 was hereby directed to be quashed.
Since assessee was a recipient of income in India after deduction of commission by the buyer outside India and no income had been received or paid inside India, which attracted TDS deduction in India, therefore, assessee was not liable to deduct TDS in India.
TPO determined ALP on the combined accounts approach rather than the split approach adopted by assessee as assessee failed to substantiate such common material costs were properly allocated segment-wise and Transfer Pricing Adjustment made at entity level should be restricted to international transactions only.
ITAT Delhi ruling on Amarjeet Kaur vs ACIT case. Disputed capital gains on property sale. Appeal outcome explained.
