Randox Laboratories India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The core issue arising for consideration is, whether the international transaction relating to purchase of reagents, spares, consumables from the AE is a simple trading activity, hence, can be benchmarked under RPM. Before we advert to the core issue, it is necessary to understand the activities […]
In our opinion, non submission of section 44AB report in cases like this does not render the assessee’s claim of a lower profit void ab initio. Failure to comply with section 44AB has to be dealt with under the provisions of section 271B. Here, the exposition emanating out of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court decision and the Tribunal decision cited supra are germane. Just that initial assessment has been done u/s 143(1), the Revenue cannot invoke provisions of re-assessment on any ground they can pick up from thin air. The Revenue can also not interpolate consequences of no compliance of provisions of the Act other than what has been expressly provided in the statute.”
R.S. Steel Manufacturers Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In this case Ld. CIT(A), it appears presumed that that the VAT receivable was very much available for set off as per the books of the assessee and as opposed to that claimed by it that it was not available for set off. We find that this finding […]
We hold that there is no question of treating the amount withdrawn by the assessee as partner from the partnership firm namely M/s SKA Enterprises in the nature of loan and advance and treat it as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. None of the ingredients of section 2(22)(e) stand satisfied in the instant case.
Abdul Wahab Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The specific words which arouse ITATs concern are the allegation that the CIT(A) order under challenge is alleged to have been passed in routine, arbitrary and whimsical manner having no sustainability in law. On-going through the record in the specific case ITAT find that none of the above allegations […]
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) As per clause 4 of the agreement between the assessee and the First Leasing (lessor) the asset shall remain the exclusive property of the lessor (First Leasing) at all times. It further provides that the lessee at no time during the lease period can capitalize the […]
ITAT hold that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Act will not have application for the relevant assessment year, namely assessment year 2018-2019.
ITAT hold that the provisions of sec.115JB are not applicable to a banking company i.e. the assessee herein also. Having held that the provisions of sec.115JB are not applicable to the assessee, we are of the opinion that grounds No.19 to 22 need no adjudication at this stage.
Addl. CIT Vs G.S. Pharmbutor P. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) It is undisputed fact that the assessee has not given any loan or advances during the year. As can be seen from the copy of account of M/s. Moderate Leasing & Capital Services Limited, assessee has been paying advances and loan to the said company from […]
LG Soft India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Sesa Goa Limited v. JCIT (supra) had held education cess is an allowable expenditure as the word ‘cess’ is conspicuously absent under the provisions of section 40(a)(ii) of the I.T.Act The Hon’ble High Court also placed reliance […]
