Om Prakash & Sons Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun) The issue pertains to levy of fee u/s 234E for the A.Y. 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. The amendment has been brought w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in case of Fatehraj Singhvi & Ors. vs. UOI & Ors. 2016 (9) TMI 964 is in favour of the […]
IRunway India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT bangalore) Facts- The assessee filed its ROI for AY 2015-16 on 27 November 2015 declaring a total income of Rs. 52,289,620 under the normal provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). The AO passed the assessment order dated 26 December 2017 u/s 143(3) of the Act making […]
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of Anup Service Station, allowing deduction for delayed deposit of PF & ESI contributions. Legal analysis and implications of the decision.
Desh Bharti Public School Samiti Vs AO/DCIT (ITAT Lucknow) We find that it is undisputed fact that assessee got registration u/s.12A of the Act w.e.f. 1.4.2013 vide order dated 2.9.2014, a copy of such registration certificate is placed in P.B. pg.24. It is also an undisputed fact that assessee in the earlier years has been […]
Mathew Pradeep Francis Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the instant case, we noticed that the assessee has made investment in acquiring new residential house property within the time given in section 54 of the Act and also within the time limit prescribed u/s 139(4) for filing revised return of income. Accordingly, following the binding decision […]
ACIT Vs Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Revenue is aggrieved with the observation of the CIT(A) that the provisions of Sec. 50C of the Act would not stand triggered in respect of the transaction of transfer of reversionary rights of the property in question by the assessee to M/s Yash & Yashika Mercantile (P) […]
Y. Manjula Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The next impediment in the minds of the tax authorities was that the plot was purchased jointly in the name of the assessee and her husband and hence it should be held that both held 50% right each and hence the assessee could have purchased only her husband’s […]
Kalpesh Synthetics Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Grievance of the assessee, as requiring our adjudication in this appeal, is that the learned CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the adjustment, made by the Centralized Processing Centre Bengaluru while processing income tax returns under section 143(1) based on certain inputs from the tax audit reports […]
A.O. had rightly endorsed the corroborated claim of the assessee in this regard, the PCIT, in our view, has attempted to substitute his wisdom by views of the A.O. without any definite basis. If the view of the PCIT towards the banakhat allegedly hollow or unenforceable is accepted, no income can be recognised at all.
Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Mumbai) In the present case, it has not been disputed that the assessee trust was duly registered under section 12AA of the Act. Thus, the only provision applicable to the assessee trust for the purpose of applying for registration is section 12A(1)(ac)(i) of the Act. Further, section […]
