DCIT (Exemption) Vs Yug Nirman Yojna Vistar Trust (ITAT Delhi) Facts- The assessee is a trust, registered u/s 12A of Income Tax Act. Perusal of assessment order dated 29.12.2016 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act; shows that registration u/s 12A was granted to the assessee by order dated 01.05.2009 of […]
Where it was discernible from record that the A.O has applied his mind to the issue in question, the ld. CIT cannot invoke section 263 of the Act merely because he has different opinion.
Held that objections of the assessee on reopening of assessment by the AO in the assessment order, these objections were never disposed off in terms of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Vs. ITO [259 ITR 19].
GE India Business Services Pvt. Vs DC/ACIT IT (ITAT Delhi) Facts- The assessee company GE India Business Services Pvt. Ltd. is set up as a captive service provider to provide offshore outsourcing services primarily to GE entities/ business worldwide. The primary activity in which Assessee Company specializes is to render IT Enabled Services (“ITES”) and […]
DCIT Vs Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) Facts- The assessee Company is mainly engaged in the manufacture of drugs & pharmaceuticals. The assessee Company filed ROI on 31.10.2001 declaring income from house property Rs.9,036/-, income from other sources Rs.1,25,40,914/- and business loss of Rs.10,26,63,568/-. AO made addition in respect of buying commission to Teknoserve […]
Whether payment made by assessee to another mobile service provider company for utilization of roaming mobile data and connectivity could not be termed as technical service as roaming process between participating entities was fully automatic and did not require any human intervention and, therefore, no TDS was deductible – Held, yes
Expenditure on maintenance, back-up and support services to existing hardware and software is revenue in nature, and therefore allow the expenditure as revenue in nature.
ACIT Vs Durga Granites (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT held that if the partners of the assessee-firm had introduced the cash in their respective books and thereafter transferred the same to the books of the assessee firm then probably the onus may be on the partners of the assessee firm to establish the source of the cash […]
Netra Software Technologies P Ltd. Vs ACIT (CPC) (ITAT Bangalore) In the present case, the assessee has not enclosed any evidence along with the return suggesting completion of construction of commercial building and its readiness to let out, as such the ACIT(CPC) denied the interest claimed by the assessee by way of intimation sent to the […]
When there was no clear documentary evidence to prove the identity of the assessee the burden of proof lies on him claiming the benefit of being the assessee.
