CIT(A), NFAC has erred in not granting an opportunity to the appellant bank to present the case through the video conferencing as specified under the Faceless Appeals Scheme 2020
Sneh Developers Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) As per the AO, the assessee has not filed return of income and hence notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been issued owing to cash transactions exceeding Rs.10,00,000/-. The AO held that the assessee has not given any details with regard to the […]
As per section 246A of the Act, the assessee has a right to file an appeal before CIT(A) against the intimation under section 200A of Act.
S.K. Agarwal (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is an admitted fact that during the AY 2015-16, the assessee HUF sold a plot of land and earned capital gain which it claimed exempt under section 54F as the assessee purchased a residential house. The only cause of denial of exemption by the Revenue is that […]
AO has made addition u/s.56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Act, towards difference between guideline value and consideration paid for purchase of property as unexplained investment.
Assessee has assigned reasons for condoning delay is that, Assessment order been misplaced by Advocate & not handed over the same to assessee
DCIT Vs Shree Swaminarayan Infrastructure Private Limited (ITAT Rajkot) In this case, assessee company has issued shares of Rs.2,92,00,000/-being 7300 equity shares of Rs.10/- each at a premium of Rs.3990/- per share and thus there is increase in share capital of Rs.73,000/-. Over and above that the company has collected premium of Rs.2,91,27,000/-. Before the […]
Home Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) On perusal of the agreement, it was observed that the assessee paid Rs.36,09,000/- being compensation paid to land-owners, for allotting less than agreed constructed area, as per development agreement. The AO asked the assessee to submit the supporting documentary evidences viz., confirmation from the parties, books of accounts of their parties […]
Held that imposing penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) justified as necessary record impounded by the department was not supplied to the assessee, accordingly assessee failed to comply with the notice u/s. 142(1).
No Addition of Cash Deposit During Demonetisation Period under section 69A If Cash Deposit Is Part of Receipts Shown on Presumptive Basis and When the Part of Cash Deposit in Pre Demonetisation-Period Was Accepted.
