The present appeal has been preferred by the revenue. The controversy involved in the present appeals pertains to the treatment of “commission income” and the amounts received by the Assessee as “subscription fee”.
Madras High Court directs the Income Tax department to decide CRC Limited’s appeal within two months, addressing the attachment of their bank account during the appeal process.
Allahabad HC: Filing a certified copy of the appealed GST order is a procedural requirement, not mandatory if the appeal is filed electronically with a copy.
Karnataka High Court held that initiation of simultaneous proceedings in relation to same year, by Assistant and Deputy Commissioner, by putting forth very same contentions is clearly impermissible in law. Accordingly, order are liable to be quashed.
Delhi High Court sets aside CESTAT order that relied on now-reviewed Canon-I judgment, remands case back based on Canon-II findings.
Allahabad HC directs GST authority to treat an ex parte order as notice due to lack of service, allowing the petitioner to respond and be heard.
Allahabad High Court rejects bail for accused in fake GST firm scam, citing nature of economic offence and precedent in related cases.
Allahabad HC stays GST recovery against Kanpur Electricity Supply Co., citing quashed circular and GST Council clarification on power sector services.
Kerala High Court rules Section 234E late fee for TDS statement delays applicable only from June 1, 2015, quashes earlier demands.
Delhi High Court rules taxpayer not entitled to interest on delayed VAT refund when incorrect bank details caused the delay, citing DVAT Act.
