Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subhra Jyoti Bharali Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Gauhati High Court)
Appeal Number : Crl. Rev.P./488/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/10/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Subhra Jyoti Bharali Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Gauhati High Court)

Section 173 of the CrPC does not prescribe piecemeal investigation and filing of incomplete charge sheet before the court. Section 173(8) CrPC prescribes that even after filing of charge sheet further investigation can be done. In that case, if the investigating officer gathers additional evidence, he can produce it after filing of the charge sheet. The law does not permit the State to expand the maximum period stipulated under Section 167(2) CrPC by filing supplementary charge sheet.

This Court has the reason to hold that the incomplete complaint (charge sheet in CrPC parlance) filed against the petitioner is against the law stipulated by Section 173 CrPC because law does not permit piecemeal investigation. Therefore, this Court holds that the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC because investigation of the case is not yet complete.

For the said reasons, the petitioner Sri Subhra Jyoti Bharali is allowed to go on bail of Rs.1,000,00/- (Rupees One Lakh) with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Assam, Kamrup(M), Guwahati subject certain conditions.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031