Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dabur India Limited Vs CIT (TDS) (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dabur India Limited Vs CIT (TDS) (Delhi High Court) 20% of disputed tax demand is not a pre-requisite for putting in abeyance recovery of demand pending first appeal in all cases Writ petition were filed challenging the order  dismissing the Petitioner’s application for stay of demand and directing the Petitioner to pay 20% of the total outstanding demand. The Delhi High Court held that  the requirement of payment of 20% of disputed tax demand is not a pre-requisite for putting in abeyance recovery of demand pending first appeal in all cases. The said pre-condition of deposit of 20% of the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening on Change of Opinion Invalid: ITAT Quashes Entire Assessment CIT(A)’s Non-Speaking Order & Failure to Address Legal Ground- Matter Remanded Section 12AB Registration Cannot Be Denied for Missing Irrevocability Clause Alone: ITAT Follows Bombay HC Reassessment Time-Barred Despite TOLA & Ashish Agarwal: ITAT Upholds Quashing Registration Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defect: ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930