M/s. Baril Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors. (Gauhati High Court) This Court is of the view that if there is a provision made for filing returns electronically and if because of certain technical glitches uploading could not be done in time, on that ground the concerned individual or firm ought […]...

Laxmi Narayan Sahu Vs Union of India & Others  (Gauhati Cigh Court) Issue Raised Before High Court In all the writ petitions, the demand-cum- show cause notices of various dates issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax of the district of Dibrugarh and Guwahati respectively are assailed. The said demand-cum...

Gauhati High Court has instructed CBDT to Consider Representation filed by Tax Bar Association on or before 25.10.2018 by which they requested to extend the Tax Audit Due Date to 31.12.2018. ...

Guwahati Tea Warehousing Association has filed a Petition in Gauhati High Court against imposition of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on loading, packing, warehousing, etc of processed tea. Case was admitted for hearing on 23.05.2018. ...

The investigating officer has objected to granting bail on the ground that further investigation is required to ascertain the source of huge money handed over to Ramesh Goenka through Pranjal Sarma. Investigation is being carried out to ascertain the mode of transfer of the bribe to the Income Tax Commissioner and how the part of the brib...

It was argued that govt does not have any jurisdiction to enter into an inquiry in respect of the subject matter of the notice and as such the impugned notice was wholly without jurisdiction....

M/s. Kumar Traders And Company & Anr. Vs. State Of Assam (Gauhati High Court) This case was adjourned on 9.8.2017, to enable the learned Govt. Advocate to receive instruction on the circumstances under, which the team from the Bureau of Investigation for Economic Offences (BIEO) had raided the Amingaon godown of the petitioners, where...

Gotanagar Truck Terminus is a plant and not building, for the purpose of claiming depreciation under Section 32 read with Section 43 of the IT Act. Consequently the assessee is held entitled to depreciation at the rate of 25% as prescribed for plant and not at 10%, as applicable for building....

There is no finding of fact to the effect that actually the loan had been granted to the managing director or any other person on interest, or that interest had actually been collected and the collection of the interest was not reflected in the accounts....

The case of the assessee is that they did not charge interest on that advance and in consideration of the same the assessee got the premises it a very low rent of rupees two per sq feet in a prime locality of Calcutta....