This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 not exercised in absence of any perversity: Delhi HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vivek Raheja Vs Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board of India (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Vivek Raheja Vs Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board of India (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not exercisable in absence of any perversity in the order passed by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
Facts- The Appellant was appointed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi to act as the Resolution Professional of Trading Engineers (International) Limited on 04.07.2019. On 15.02.2021, the Resolution Plan vis-à-vis the Corporate Debtor was approved...
Author Info
