Corporate Law : Gujarat High Court held that it would not be appropriate to invoke its extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 ...
Company Law : NCLT Ahmedabad held that Corporate Debtor [Shree Ram Cottex Industries Pvt. Ltd.] is admitted into liquidation in terms of provisi...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court held that initiation of proceedings under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 without issuing Form GST ASMT-10 as ...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that claim of wages and salaries after the issuance of the layoff notice rightly rejected since the appellant wor...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court held that having regard to the provisions of Section 55(6) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the Tribunal, acti...
Gujarat High Court held that it would not be appropriate to invoke its extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the present case involving possession and control of assets with corporate debtor during liquidation.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that Corporate Debtor [Shree Ram Cottex Industries Pvt. Ltd.] is admitted into liquidation in terms of provisions of section 33(1)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in view of rejection of resolution plan u/s. 31(2) for non-compliance with statutory requirements.
Gauhati High Court held that initiation of proceedings under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 without issuing Form GST ASMT-10 as prescribed under section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017 is invalid. Accordingly, held that action is contrary to the provisions of law.
NCLAT Delhi held that claim of wages and salaries after the issuance of the layoff notice rightly rejected since the appellant workmen due to issuance of the layoff notice has not worked after issuance of this layoff notice. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
Bombay High Court held that having regard to the provisions of Section 55(6) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the Tribunal, acting as an Appellate Authority, certainly had powers to modify the order of part payment passed in First Appeal while hearing the Second Appeal.
