A ruling on whether the decision of the GST Council granting the exemption is binding on the Department in the absence of non-issuance of corresponding Notification by the Central/State Government is not within the competence and mandate of the Authority of Advance Ruling constituted u/s 96 of the OGST Act.
Notification No. 10/2019-Customs (ADD)- Seeks to amend notification No. 35/2018-Customs (ADD) dated 9th July, 2018 to amend the name of exporters at S. Nos. 1 and 2 of the duty table.
Central Government, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 61/2015- Customs (ADD), dated the 11th December, 2015, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 955(E), dated the11th December, 2015, namely:-
Tvl. R K Motors Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) It is also not in dispute that the bill is addressed only to the writ petitioner’s principal office at Sivakasi; delivery alone is to be made at Virudhunagar. I am of the view that even if by mistake, a wrong instruction had been given to the driver of the vehicle to head towards Sivakasi. Still it would not really matter. The only question that the respondent ought to have posed is […]
Standards on Auditing (SAs) recognize the importance of ‘External Confirmations’ as audit evidence. Relevant extracts of some SAs regarding external confirmations are reproduced below.
a) Complaints received from foreign buyers in respect of poor quality of the products supplied by exporters from India; b) Complaints of importers against foreign suppliers in respect of quality of the products supplied;
Where assessee’s debtor directly made payment through banking channel to assessee’s creditor to square up their account, provisions of section 40A(3) would not be attracted.
Making of incorrect claim in law would not by itself amount to concealment of income or giving inaccurate particulars of income. Since revenue had not been able to show even remotely that there was any concealment of income or filing of inaccurate particulars of income, appeal was to be dismissed.
As per circular no. 25/2012 dated August 9, 2012 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), paragraph 6 of Accounting Standard (AS) 11 and paragraph 4(e) of AS 16 shall not apply to a company that opts to apply paragraph 46A of AS 11.
In addition to the existing schedule of stock derivatives moving to physical settlement, if a stock satisfies any of the following criteria, then derivative on such stock shall be moved to physical settlement from the new expiry cycle.
