Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Shri Dilip Ranjrekar (ITAT Banaglore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 858/Bang/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/11/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs. Shri Dilip Ranjrekar (ITAT Banaglore)

It is apparent from the facts of the case as mentioned (along with copies of corroborative documentary evidence) and discussed above from para 7.1 to 4.4.3 of this order (Supra) that the non completion of the construction the flat by the builder within the stipulated period is beyond the control of the assessee. In our considered opinion, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Smt. B.S. Shantakumari (Supra) and Sambandam Udaykumar (Supra) the assessee cannot be denied exemption u/s 54 of the Act to the extent of investment in the new property, even though the construction of the new asset is not completed within the eligible period of 3 years for the date of sale/transfer of the original asset. With respect to the amount invested in construction of the new property before the date of transfer of the original asset, it is well settled law that the amount invested within one year before the date of transfer of the original asset is to be allowed exemption u/s 54 of the Act. From the details of investments for purchase of the new asset as submitted by the assessee, it is stated that the assessee has only invested an amount of Rs. 2,26,82,097/- towards construction of the property. The AO is therefore directed to restrict the exemption allowable to the assessee to the actual amount spent on construction after due verification. We hold and direct accordingly. Consequently, Revenue’s ground Nos. 5 and 6 and the assessee’s C.O. ground No. 1 are disposed off as indicated above.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT

This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-1, Bangalore dated 28/1/2016 for asst. year 2012-13. The assessee has also filed cross objections in this regard.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as under:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Rajesh says:

    What happens if the construction period is over 5 years. Will pre-contruction interest will be allowed as deduction after possession?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031