Notification No. 17/2015-2020 Para 2.07 of the FTP regarding principles of prohibition and restrictions , is amended to be in line with international agreements.
Subhash Kumar Singh Vs State of Assam and Anr. (Gauhati High Court) It has been, prima facie, found that the evasion of tax was more than Rs. 5 crores which necessitated the arrest of the Petitioner in compliance of the provision of Section 132 (1) (i) of the Assam GST Act, 2017. Hence, the argument […]
GST Revenue for July 2021 > ₹ 1,16,393 crores gross GST revenue collected in July The gross GST revenue collected in the month of July 2021 is Rs. 1,16,393 crores of which CGST is Rs. 22,197 crores, SGST is Rs. 28,541 crores, IGST is Rs. 57,864 crores (including Rs. 27,900 crores collected on import of […]
The trial period of CHIMS is extended by further two months i.e. upto 30.09.2021 and the registration at CIIIMS portal will be effective from 01.10.2021.
Rs 99,756 crore disputed tax amount settled under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme The scheme ‘Vivad Se Vishwas’ is a voluntary scheme for resolving pending direct tax disputes amicably with the taxpayers and no targets were fixed by the Government under the Scheme. This was stated by Union Minister of State for Finance Shri Pankaj Chaudhary […]
Autodesk Asia Pte. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) It was the case of the assessee that the sale of software / hardware was made outside India and the proceeds received from Indian distributors / customers was received by the assessee outside India. In the draft Order of Assessment, the AO treated the money received by […]
B. Anandan Vs Government of India (Madras High Court) The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 4.2.2021 for the offence punishable u/s 132 (1) (d) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The petitioner is an Executive Director of […]
The mere fact that the order of the appellate authority is not ‘acceptable’, which itself is an objectionable phrase, can be no ground for not allowing the claim unless the decision of the appellate authority has been suspended by a competent Court. Supreme Court emphasized that if such healthy rule of judicial discipline is not followed, it would result in undue harassment to the asssessees and chaos in the administration of tax laws.
Perfect Probuild P. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) A reading of section 194C with Explanation (iv) thereof makes it clear that any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident for carrying out the work of advertising, broadcasting and telecasting shall deduct an amount equivalent to 1% where the payment is being made to […]
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) signs a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India for research collaboration Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Notification No. IBBI/PR/2021/17 6th August, 2021 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India signs a Memorandum of Understanding with National Stock Exchange of India for research collaboration […]
