It is, therefore, essential that an IP is familiar with the processes and procedures followed for filing and submission before the NCLT. In furtherance of this, at the request of the IBBI, the NCLT has kindly agreed to allow a newly registered IP to attend and observe the proceedings of NCLT for five days.
In re Mr. Mr. Kailash Chandra (M/s Mali Construction) (GST AAR Rajasthan) The activity of supply, design, installation, commissioning and testing of reverse osmosis plant and O &M work by the applicant is a Works Contract of Composite Supply. This composite supply is a mixed of goods and services and predominant supply is supply of […]
Applicant, sought Advance Ruling in Place of Supply issue, which is outside the purview of the Advance Ruling Authority as per Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017 Hence the application is not admitted under Sec 98 (2) of CGST Act, 2017 and APGST Act, 2017.
Central Government hereby makes following amendment to the notification number S.O. 2088(E) dated the 24th May, 2018 published in the Gazette of India
Adoption of ICAI Software on Allotment of Statutory Bank-Branch Audit by Banks As you know, we have over the years expressed our concern on the appointment of auditors of public sector banks by Banks’ Board themselves and on the autonomy given to them.
Cushman And Wakefield India Private Limited Vs Union of India & Anr (Delhi High Court) The issue which falls for consideration is in a very narrow compass, whether a company, other than a subsidiary company, joint venture or associate of other company forms a separate class for the purpose of eligibility for registration as a […]
In re M/s NHPC Limited (GST AAR Uttarakhand) Whether the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended from time to time) is applicable to the contractors/sub-contractors involved in the construction of Indo-Nepal Border Road or otherwise? We have different views on the applicability of GST on the sub-contractors as discussed supra. Since we […]
In re GVS projects Private limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether the value of materials recovered from our RA bills issued on cost recovery basis by APSPDCL is liable to tax under RCM as per Notification No.13/2017 Central Tax Rate dated 28.06.2017 or not ? The value of materials recovered on cost recovery basis by […]
The above works undertaken by APEPDCL are for business purpose and the benefit of Concessional Rate of 12% (6% under Central tax and 6% State tax) are any other concessional rate is NOT available to the applicant.
Shri Harish M. Kukreja Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The solitary issue involved in the present appeal is towards extent of disallowance permissible under s.14A of the Act. We find merit in the plea raised on behalf of the assessee that the disallowance under s.14A of the Act cannot surpass the quantum of exempt income in […]
