Refund under section 244A(1)(b) of the Act on self assessment tax is to be paid from the date of payment of self assessment tax till the date of grant of refund.
Dis allowance under section 40(a)(ia) on the ground that the assessee had failed to deduct the tax at source on payment made was not justified as the recipient had already paid the taxes on the sources of income and due certificate was also furnished by the assessee.
The Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has ruled that date of possession is not material fact for deciding the period of holding to Compute Short Term or Long Term Capital Gain.
Taxpayer has paid all liability along with late fees and interest, but is unable to file Form GSTR 3B due to system error. Will he/she have to pay more late fees?
Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), recently upheld the book-value based taxation of partner on capital contribution of immovable property in the case of a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and proclaimed in its recently published order.
In the case of M/s Abhipra Capital Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Investigation), the Delhi High Court held that amount paid to National Stock Exchange (NSE) as non-adjustable deposit for acquisition of membership cannot be treated as revenue expenditure and the same would be termed as capital expenditure.
In re Ceat Limited (AAR Maharashtra) Applicant is engaged in the manufacturing of tyres of kind used in three-wheeled Electric-rickshaws which are used to transport goods and passengers over short distances. The applicant, M/s Ceat Ltd. has filed the application under section 97 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and requested to […]
In re Simple Rajendra Shukla (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether Services related to providing coaching for entrance exam will come in the ambit of GST? FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA 1. The applicant Simmple Rajendra Shukla has filed the application under section 97 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, […]
The Complainant vide his RTI application sought information regarding the total amount paid to Guest House/ Houses for stay by Shri S.K. Roy, JCIT, Range-3, Bokaro during the month of October, 2016.
Ajesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. CIT (Rajasthan High Court) What is to be considered is that for being granted benefit under sub-section (37) of section 10 of the Act, the land in question should have been put to agricultural use by the assessee for the preceding two years. Even if we accept the contention of the […]
