It has been decided to extend eSANCHIT to all EDI locations on a voluntary basis. Though this facility would be provided to trade on a voluntary basis, it must be ensured, in preparation for making this facility mandatory, that every Customs broker and self-filer (all ICEGATE users) develops the capability to use eSANCHIT as envisaged in Customs circular 40/2017.
Commentaries on the Union Budget, especially in the English language, can be lop-sided, reflecting interests of a small slice of society. The Union Budget is only one instrument available to Union government and there is no reason why a Budget for 2018-19 should represent a break with what a government has sought to do since 2014.
Sec. 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), is one such deeming provision that has remain point of litigation over various issues since its inception. One such issue is applicability of provisions of section 2(22)(e) when a shareholder is beneficial shareholder or registered shareholder.
Kamla Devi Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Non-issuance of notice under section 143(2) was not a procedural error which could have been corrected in the wake of deeming provisions of section 292BB. Thus, assessment completed under section 143(3) read with section 147 was quashed. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed […]
Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 139(1) Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 80 Return of income–Requirement to file return electronically–Return filed manually–Claim for set-off and carry forward of losses Conclusion: Simply because the assessee could not file the return electronically within the provisions of section 139(1), the benefit of set-off and carry forward of losses could not be denied for the reason that the assessee did file return of income manually within the due date specified under section 139(1).
Where assessee sold certain property and utilized a part of the consideration towards purchase of new house, however, failed to deposit unutilized consideration in specified accounts before due date under section 139(1), AO was justified in restricting deduction under section 54F proportionately.
While upholding the compounding guidelines issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), a division bench of the Delhi High Court held that the amount of compounding fee can be more than the principal amount if there is willful default in the payment of tax on the part of the assessee.
Miss Indira Vasanji Shah Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) owners of the plot have authorised the developer to take the plot and the moment the assessee has booked the flat and flat has been allotted to the assessee, a valuable right has created. It is a capital asset and that right continued till the assessee entered […]
Seeks to increase BCD tariff rate on Chana (Chickpeas), [Tariff item 0713 20 0] from 30% to 40% by invoking section 8A (1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and accordingly, the effective rate of BCD on Chana (Chickpeas), will also be 40%
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and sub-section (12) of section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975)
