B.M.C. is offering Debris on call service at very reasonable rate of Rs.346 + 15% Supervision Charges/MT. You just need to whatsaap / call on 1) Shri. Satish Sulakhe – Mobile No. 7977785039 2) Shri. Dilip Rane – Mobile No. 7506366636
Length of delay is not a material to condone the delay and rather the cause of delay is to be considered for condonation of the delay.
Hashesh V. Patel (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT consider it fair and proper and in the interest of justice to give one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee. However, keeping in view the casual and negligent attitude of the assessee especially during the course of assessment proceedings, ITAT impose a cost of […]
Carry bag made of virgin or recycled plastic, shall not be less than seventy-five microns in thickness with effect from the 30th September, 2021 and one hundred and twenty (120) microns in thickness with effect from the 31st December. 2022.
Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs Vs The State of Goa and Anr. (Supreme Court of India) High Court has held that action of the State Government in requiring the original petitioners to retire at the age of 58 years or not permitting them to continue in their service upto the age of 60 years […]
These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Employees’ Service) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
Shri Pankaj Surana Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) As per Section 57(iii) of the Act, any expenditure not being in the nature of a capital expenditure, laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of making or earning income under the head ‘income from other sources’ is to be allowed as a deduction. As […]
Rajesh Kumar Malhotra Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) This Court is of the view that the Petitioner has not been provided an adequate opportunity to put forward its defense/reply as the annexure accompanying the notice enumerating the reasons for initiating reassessment pertained to the Assessment Year 2015-16 and not 2018-19. It is pertinent to mention […]
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) It is not disputed by both the parties that there is no finding in the assessment order for levy of penalty for the alleged default u/s. 271B of the Act and it is also not disputed that after passing of the order on 31.12.2011, the alleged […]
CIT (A) has erred in facts and law in holding that loss from sale of shares was short-term capital losses and hence not eligible for set of against income from profession of assessee.
