Section 271B penalty proceedings after 30 months of completion of assessment is barred by limitation
Case Law Details
Case Name : Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Raipur
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
It is not disputed by both the parties that there is no finding in the assessment order for levy of penalty for the alleged default u/s. 271B of the Act and it is also not disputed that after passing of the order on 31.12.2011, the alleged notice is only issued on 16.06.2014 after two and half year time which is very abnormal time to fasten the liability on account alleged default after the assessment is completed. In between there is not notice and even the assessment order is silent on the levy of the alleged penalty. The argument of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

