This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Right to Arear of pension cannot be denied to Appellant wrongly superannuated/retired at the age of 58 years instead of 60
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs Vs The State of Goa and Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs Vs The State of Goa and Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
High Court has held that action of the State Government in requiring the original petitioners to retire at the age of 58 years or not permitting them to continue in their service upto the age of 60 years is illegal and null and void, we are of the view that the High Court has erred in observing that the appellant will not be entitled to any arrears of pension and the pension at the revised rates will become payable only from 1st January, 2020. As such, the High Court may be right and/or ju...
