Sri Raja Reddy Nalla Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee had received cash in connection with sale of immovable property . As the amount was more than the specified limit of Rs. 20,000/- , penalty proceedings u/s. 271D were initiated for violating Sec 269SS and penalty order u/s. 271D was passed levying a penalty of […]
Read about Pratap Singh Yadav’s appeal against an assessment order, citing violation of CBDT Circular No.19/2019 requiring DIN. Learn how the tribunal ruled the order as invalid.
Kanta Govind Singh Vs ACIT CPC TDS (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee, aged 85 years, purchased property from non-residents joint owners. TDS was deducted u/s 195 at lower rates as the sellers obtained lower tax certificates. Sale consideration was paid on 20.06.19 & TDS was also paid on the same day though assessee could have paid the […]
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on the taxation of on-money received on the sale of agricultural land, examining the exemption and tax implications under the Income Tax Act.
Explore the ITAT Pune ruling on the disallowance of car expenses incurred by a private limited company for personal use by directors, citing relevant case law and legal principles.
Explore the ITAT Ranchi ruling on penalty imposition for non-audit of books, analyzing the distinction between maintenance and audit requirements under Sections 44AA and 44AB of the Income Tax Act.
Sri. Sandeep Patwari Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Violation of procedural norm does not extinguish substantive right of claiming Foreign Tax credit (FTC) Assessee received 143(1) intimation wherein the foreign tax credit (FTC) of Rs.14,02,442 was not granted. Rectification application filed u/s 154 too did not allow the claim of the assessee. CIT(A) confirmed the 154 […]
mere non-disclosure of agricultural income in the return of income does not change the characteristics of land. Subsequent use of land by the purchaser has no connection to decide the nature of land, whether it is an agricultural land.
Mehala Machines India limited Vs ITO (TDS) (Madras High Court) TDS Delay- Offence u/s 276/278- Separate notice u/s 2(35) is not necessary before issuance of SCN to consider Directors as principal officers The Company assessee had deducted TDS but failed to pay within the prescribed time. As the Petitioners (Company & directors) had delayed the […]
Ravindra Dayanand Sankeshwar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee, an individual/ proprietor claimed expenses towards interest on unsecured loans. 30% disallowance of interest expenditure for non-deduction of TDS was upheld by CIT(A) holding that Act requires the forms to be submitted before the competent authority during the year under consideration and not at the time scrutiny […]
