Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravindra Dayanand Sankeshwar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ravindra Dayanand Sankeshwar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

Assessee, an individual/ proprietor claimed expenses  towards interest  on unsecured loans. 30% disallowance of interest expenditure for non-deduction of TDS was upheld by CIT(A) holding that Act requires the forms to be submitted before the competent authority during the year under consideration and not at the time scrutiny assessment to get the benefit of allowance u/s 40(a)(ia).

Assessee had filed the necessary form 15G/15H from th

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 263 Revision for Non-Initiation of Penalty Proceedings Erroneous: ITAT Mumbai Assessee Proving Three Ingredients U/S 68 Shifts Burden to AO: ITAT Pune Sending Notices Merely by Mail is Denial of Hearing Opportunity: ITAT Bangalore No Capital Gains for Joint Owner Without Beneficial Ownership: ITAT Mumbai Only Acquisitions under Section 96 of Right to Fair Compensation Act are Exempt View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31