Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mehala Machines India limited Vs ITO (TDS) (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Mehala Machines India limited Vs ITO (TDS) (Madras High Court) TDS Delay- Offence u/s 276/278- Separate notice u/s 2(35) is not necessary before issuance of SCN to consider Directors as principal officers The Company assessee  had deducted TDS but failed to pay  within the prescribed time. As the Petitioners (Company & directors) had delayed the deposit of TDS, Revenue filed complaints as they were liable for offences under Section 276 B r/w 278 Relying  upon the Judgment of Madras HC  in ITO vs. Roshini Cold Storage (P.) Ltd., and others reported in [2000] 245 ITR 322 (Mad), Petitione...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Restores Section 80P Deduction Claim of Agricultural Credit Co-op Society Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031