Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Raja Reddy Nalla Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Sri Raja Reddy Nalla Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Assessee had received cash in connection with sale of immovable property . As the amount was more than the specified limit of Rs. 20,000/- , penalty proceedings u/s. 271D were initiated for violating Sec 269SS and penalty order u/s. 271D was passed levying a penalty of Rs. 40,00,000/-. Assesse pleaded, inter alia, ignorance of law before the CIT (A) who confirmed the penalty.

On further appeal, assessee raised various grounds. Subsequently the assessee raised

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reasons First, Notice Later: Illegal Reassessment Quashed Holding Company Is in Business Even Without Operating Revenue Reasons Must Precede Section 148 Notice, Reopening Quashed Interest on Fixed Deposits Exempt When Article 289 Applies Sales Accepted, Purchases Can’t Be Bogus Under MVAT Alerts View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031